Mealey's (June 17, 2015, 8:04 AM EDT) -- HELENA, Mont. — An objector to a water diversion application failed to present evidence that the holder put the water to beneficial use, that the diversion involved a separate water source and that the holder abandoned its rights, the Montana Supreme Court ruled Sept. 16, 2014 (Donald C. Marks v. 71 Ranch, LP, No. DA 13-0489, Mont. Sup.; 2014 Mont. LEXIS 589)....