1st Circuit Finds Error In Exclusion Of Testimony On Surgical Procedure Viability

(December 17, 2015, 11:35 AM EST) -- BOSTON — In a medical malpractice action, the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Dec. 16 that a trial judge erred in excluding expert testimony that a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was a viable non-surgical alternative to a surgical biopsy (Barbara J. Bradley and Michael Bradley v. David J. Sugarbaker, M.D., No. 15-1128, 1st Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21840).

(Opinion available. Document #30-160115-009Z.)

Barbara and Michael Bradley alleged that after experiencing shortness of breath and persistent pain in her right arm and wrist following...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections