No New Evidence To Support Motion To Reconsider, Nevada Federal Judge Says

(December 14, 2015, 1:03 PM EST) -- LAS VEGAS — No coverage is owed for underlying environmental contamination claims alleged against an insured because the policies at issue clearly preclude coverage for releases of pollutants that occur on the insured’s premises and for releases of pollutants that are caused by third parties, a Nevada federal judge reiterated Dec. 11 in denying an insured’s motion for reconsideration (Southern Nevada TBA Supply Co. d/b/a Ted Wiens Tire and Auto Centers v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co., No. 15-46; D. Nev.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166253)....
To view the full article, register now.