Mealey's (November 12, 2015, 12:21 PM EST) -- OCALA, Fla. — A contractor was not an additional insured for purposes of coverage for an underlying construction defects case, a Florida federal judge ruled Nov. 10, also finding that the insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify because there was no alleged “property damage” (Joseph Bradfield and Patricia Bradfield v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co., No. 13-222, M.D. Fla.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152297)....