Architect Argues Attorney Fees Award To Defendants In Copyright Suit Was Error
(October 29, 2015, 9:59 AM EDT) -- WASHINGTON, D.C. — An appellate court’s decision to affirm an award to two copyright infringement defendants for their attorney fees “rewards appropriation and copying with permission to exceed the license,” the owner of an architectural firm argues in a Sept. 30 petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court (Marshall Hunn v. Dan Wilson Homes Inc., et al., No. 15-431, U.S. Sup.).
(Petition for writ of certiorari available. Document #78-151102-012B.)
Finding no abuse of discretion in a Texas federal judge’s decision to award...