Judge Finds Question Exists On Whether Cameras Could Have Stopped Assault

(August 31, 2015, 1:52 PM EDT) -- COLUMBIA, S.C. — A South Carolina federal judge on Aug. 26 refused to set aside an order denying motions for summary judgment filed by a security company and the owners of a mall, finding that issues of fact exist as to whether they had a duty to install security cameras and whether the cameras would have prevented an assault that the property (Laura B. Moise, et al. v. AlliedBarton Security Services LLC, No. 3:12-cv-02022, D. S.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112983).

(Opinion available. Document #77-150909-003Z.)...
To view the full article, register now.