9th Circuit Panel Finds Policy Is Not Ambiguous, Upholds Ruling In Favor Of Insurer

Mealey's (August 7, 2015, 8:44 AM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A district court did not err in entering judgment in a disability insurer’s favor because the claimant clearly does not qualify for lifetime benefits under the policy at issue, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said July 28 (Jeffrey L. Wissot DDS v. Great West Life & Annuity Insurance Co., No. 13-56195, 9th Cir.; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13121).

(Unpublished opinion available. Document #17-150810-013Z.)

Jeffrey Wissot, a dentist, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, against...
To view the full article, register now.