Judge: Surgeon’s Opinion On Procedure Creates Genuine Issue In Medical Malpractice Case

(September 28, 2016, 12:02 PM EDT) -- NEW YORK — A urological surgeon may testify on the performance of a ureteroscopy procedure and its expected risks and outcomes, a New York federal judge ruled Sept. 26, finding that this testimony creates a genuine issue of dispute concerning a medical malpractice claim (John Bosco v. United States of America, No. 14-3525, S.D. N.Y.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131563).

(Opinion and order available. Document #30-161014-012Z.)

John Bosco sued the U.S. government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) after a routine surgical procedure performed at...
To view the full article, register now.