Insured Files Reply Brief, Says Insurer Failed To Show Rescission Ruling Was Proper
Mealey's (August 2, 2016, 12:50 PM EDT) -- PITTSBURGH — In a reply brief filed July 27 in the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal, an insured reiterates that a Pennsylvania federal judge incorrectly found that an insurer’s rescission of a product contamination insurance policy was warranted and maintains that the insurer failed to prove that the judge’s ruling was supported by the evidence (H.J. Heinz Co. v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Co., No. 16-1447, 3rd Cir.).